==============================================
Like communism banning music and religion, or Nazi book burning, islam has a way of trying to
In Egypt there are sites the government refuses access, banning archaeological digs at those locations, simply because they do not desire anyone else to find what they already know. That Jews existed in those areas. Not just as bands of wandering nomads, but as civilized and metropolitan people.
Along with the changing of this past, many muslims believe that the Temple Mount is sacred to their faith. If mohammed went to the far mosque, it certainly had to be located somewhere else. The Dome of the Rock was not even built until 60 years after mohammed died. So the Dome of the Rock cannot be the place where mohammed went, as there was no mosque in place there when he died. In fact, the expectation that it would become another Mecca or Medina fizzled out, and it went into disrepair less than 20 years after its completion.
Muslims never showed an interest in a Hadj to that place. It was not a muslim holy place back then, and is not one today as far as history is concerned. It has become nothing more than a rallying point for jihad, and a political bargaining chip. In fact, the quran even says that allah gave that area to the Jews. So by trying to take it away, they disobey their own god and prophet. They transgress their own holy book. Why would mohammed claim that Jerusalem is holy, yet turn his back towards the city when he prayed? Muslims are fighting for something that their own prophet turned his back on. Interesting, isn’t it?
However, it is a holy place for the Jews. It has been since before the temple was first built by Solomon, after the captivity in Babylon, and throughout the ages. The Wailing Wall is evidence that it once stood. The tunnels beneath, the ramps, the ritual baths, and other artifacts show that it existed when the Bible says it did, and used for the sole purpose of Jewish rituals. The site and the architecture are detailed in the Bible, not the quran. But somehow it has become a bone of contention to muslims who claim otherwise.
It is sacred as well to Christians, yet they make no claims to the mount or its ruins. Nor do they protest when Israel decides to as they wish with it. No jihad is waged, no threats, no wars begin over it. Other than the usual stops for touring pilgrims that show places as detailed in the Bible, it is never an issue. To dent that would be to deny ones own faith in Christianity.
So you have to wonder what is it about islam that thinks it can destroy other religious artifacts, and make claim to sites that they never had any claim to? Just ask those in India who see a mosque sitting atop the site where their temple used to sit. I think muslims are afraid of history because it will show them things they do not want to see. They do not want to see the holes in their own dogma. They do not want to see that the reason they kill Jews is no reason at all. They do not want to admit that the excuse they have been using all these years to exterminate Jews is based on falsehood. And they do not want to have to sit around and find another way to impose islam on a global level beginning with the Jews.
History and archaeology have shown what the rest of the world never really doubted. That Israel has its history and its faith in Jerusalem and on that Temple mount. The heart and soul of Judaism rests in those places, and no matter how many artifacts you destroy, or how many fables you concoct to make people believe otherwise, that will never change the truth. It is similar to the lies of the Holocaust deniers. Their lies will never cover up the branded flesh and great loss of life.
Muslims can believe mohammed was ignorant enough to visit a mosque that did not exist. They can believe the Jews never had a temple there. They can believe that islam has the rights to that place. But in the end, it will never change the truth.
The Temple Mount always has and always will be Jewish. Just ask allah or mohammed. They said the same thing...
More on the muslim false claims on Jerusalem.
Constructing a counterfeit History of Jerusalem.
No comments:
Post a Comment