Living under Oppression.

The head of the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) accused the West of anti-muslim bias on Thursday and warned journalists against automatically linking islam with terrorism. "Bias against Islam has increased since 9/11 and a series of terrorist acts in Europe. What we see now is a monologue, not a dialogue, and that increases divisions," Here.

Monologue? Division???

28:86 never help them, 9:23 sever family ties with those who value disbelief over belief (islam). 29:8, 31:14-15 Be kind/good to your parents, but do not obey them if they are unislamic/non-muslim. 3:118 don’t take them for friends. 3:28 don’t take them for friends, unless merely superficially, as a temporary precaution (taqiyya). 4:139-140 do not choose disbelievers instead of believers for friends. 4:144 don’t choose disbelievers instead of believers as friends. 5:51. do not take Christians and Jews as friends. 5:57 don’t take as friends/guardians those who mock or jest Islam. 8:73 join together, to defend yourselves and your religion, against their corruption. 60:1 do not take them for friends. 60:13 don’t make friends with those who disbelieve in the (Islamic) Hereafter. 53:29 shun them. 58:5 humiliate them. 4:63 oppose them and admonish them. 66:9 strive hard against them and be stern with them. 9:14 fight them and Allah will punish them by your hands, bringing them to disgrace. 9:73-74 strive hard against the disbelievers and hypocrites and be harsh against them. 9:123 fight the disbelievers near you and let them find harshness in you. 66:9 strive hard against them and be stern with them. 5:54 be stern/mighty against the disbelievers, but humble with believers. 48:28-29 conquer them all, and act hard against them, but be merciful to believers. 68:8-10. do not obey and do not compromise with them. 76:24 do not obey them. 33:48 don’t comply with them/ don’t obey them. 25:52 don’t obey but fight them. 4:101 disbelievers are an open enemy to you. 60:4 hate them forever unless they join islam. 31:7 give them tidings of a painful punishment/doom. 45:7-8 give them tidings of a painful punishment/doom. 84:24 announce to them a painful. punishment/doom... Now that is division.

We forgive them, but they do not forgive us. We help them, but they do not help us. We give them the benefit of the doubt, but they assume we're guilty (45:31, 83:29). We're compassionate toward them, but do they feel empathy for us? We're tolerant toward them, but they're not tolerant toward us. The sooner we wake up the sooner we'll see the islamic agenda and the objective of the most recent protest by muslims against the detention of suspects accused of inciting terrorism in London. “UK — You will pay!”. Here.


Why muslims are Afraid of History.

^Wailing Wall^^^===========================^^^Al Aqsa^
Muslims destroyed millennia old Buddhist statues in Afghanistan, countless holy places in India, and even underneath the Temple Mount. We saw when Palestinians desecrated the Church of The Nativity in Jerusalem by using it as a base for snipers and desecrating the insides while doing so. No big deal. After all, it is a holy site of infidels, not a cartoon of mohammed. Why waste a good rampage on infidels?

Like communism banning music and religion, or Nazi book burning, islam has a way of trying to
create its own past and future. The entire world outside of islam knows that there was a Jewish temple where the Dome of the Rock sits. Ancient Babylonian and Roman references to them exist, as well as the actual artifacts beneath the old Temple site. The same artifacts Arafat tried to destroy. Recently muslims concocted a story that those Israelis were unearthing Jewish and Roman artifacts of the time were 'actually' plotting to sink the Dome of the Rock. Why would they do this? Because in the huge piles of rubble left by desecrating Palestinians, the Israelis have unearthed more proof that they existed there long before the Palestinians.

In Egypt there are sites the government refuses access, banning archaeological digs at those locations, simply because they do not desire anyone else to find what they already know. That Jews existed in those areas. Not just as bands of wandering nomads, but as civilized and metropolitan people.

Along with the changing of this past, many muslims believe that the Temple Mount is sacred to their faith. If mohammed went to the far mosque, it certainly had to be located somewhere else. The Dome of the Rock was not even built until 60 years after mohammed died. So the Dome of the Rock cannot be the place where mohammed went, as there was no mosque in place there when he died. In fact, the expectation that it would become another Mecca or Medina fizzled out, and it went into disrepair less than 20 years after its completion.

Muslims never showed an interest in a Hadj to that place. It was not a muslim holy place back then, and is not one today as far as history is concerned. It has become nothing more than a rallying point for jihad, and a political bargaining chip. In fact, the quran even says that allah gave that area to the Jews. So by trying to take it away, they disobey their own god and prophet. They transgress their own holy book. Why would mohammed claim that Jerusalem is holy, yet turn his back towards the city when he prayed? Muslims are fighting for something that their own prophet turned his back on. Interesting, isn’t it?

However, it is a holy place for the Jews. It has been since before the temple was first built by Solomon, after the captivity in Babylon, and throughout the ages. The Wailing Wall is evidence that it once stood. The tunnels beneath, the ramps, the ritual baths, and other artifacts show that it existed when the Bible says it did, and used for the sole purpose of Jewish rituals. The site and the architecture are detailed in the Bible, not the quran. But somehow it has become a bone of contention to muslims who claim otherwise.

It is sacred as well to Christians, yet they make no claims to the mount or its ruins. Nor do they protest when Israel decides to as they wish with it. No jihad is waged, no threats, no wars begin over it. Other than the usual stops for touring pilgrims that show places as detailed in the Bible, it is never an issue. To dent that would be to deny ones own faith in Christianity.

So you have to wonder what is it about islam that thinks it can destroy other religious artifacts, and make claim to sites that they never had any claim to? Just ask those in India who see a mosque sitting atop the site where their temple used to sit. I think muslims are afraid of history because it will show them things they do not want to see. They do not want to see the holes in their own dogma. They do not want to see that the reason they kill Jews is no reason at all. They do not want to admit that the excuse they have been using all these years to exterminate Jews is based on falsehood. And they do not want to have to sit around and find another way to impose islam on a global level beginning with the Jews.

History and archaeology have shown what the rest of the world never really doubted. That Israel has its history and its faith in Jerusalem and on that Temple mount. The heart and soul of Judaism rests in those places, and no matter how many artifacts you destroy, or how many fables you concoct to make people believe otherwise, that will never change the truth. It is similar to the lies of the Holocaust deniers. Their lies will never cover up the branded flesh and great loss of life.

Muslims can believe mohammed was ignorant enough to visit a mosque that did not exist. They can believe the Jews never had a temple there. They can believe that islam has the rights to that place. But in the end, it will never change the truth.

The Temple Mount always has and always will be Jewish. Just ask allah or mohammed. They said the same thing...

Judaism made Jerusalem a holy city over three thousand years ago.
More on the muslim false claims on Jerusalem.
Constructing a counterfeit History of Jerusalem.


The Root Cause of Terrorism

It's becoming popular to talk about "the root causes of terrorism."
Lately, we've heard:
- The root cause of terrorism is foreign domination and control of muslim resources.
- The root cause of terrorism is the hatred of the Western way of life.
- The root cause of terrorism is alienation.
- The root cause of terrorism is poverty and illiteracy.
- The root cause of terrorism is the moral decadence of the West.
- The root cause of terrorism is the West's support for Israel.
Do you know what I think is the root cause of terrorism?
It works.
By that I mean those using terrorism in the world today do it because it achieves their objectives. Simple.
No place does it work more effectively than in Israel – once seen as a bulwark against islamist terrorism. If you want a case study in the enabling of terrorism, the encouraging of terrorism, the feeding and cultivation of terrorism, look no further than the Jewish state.
Let's look at the cost of unrelenting terrorism in the Jewish state over the last six years since Ariel Sharon was elected as a hard-line prime minister to put an end to attacks but who betrayed his constituency:
- 56 percent of Israelis support negotiating even with Hamas, a terrorist organization sworn to the Jewish state's destruction;
- 75 percent of Israelis believe their country is struggling for its very survival;
- The more Israel has acceded to the demands of terrorists, the more terrorism has increased;
- The more Israel has unilaterally retreated from lands won in hard-fought combat, the more emboldened its attackers have become;
- The more accommodating Israel is with the terrorists, the higher become the demands on the Jewish state by international busybodies who blame their own problems with terrorists on Israel. It's a vicious cycle. But it is a cycle benefiting the terrorists, demonstrating its effectiveness as a tactic. What do the terrorists want besides killing and terrifying people?
Ultimately, it is very simple. They want the entire world subjugated to islamic rule and law.
There are only two ways to stop the terrorism:
- Surrender and live under the domination of Islam.
- Soundly defeat the Islamic jihad.
You can't talk to it. You can't buy it off. You can't understand it. You can't win it over with compassion. You can't reason with it. You can't negotiate with it. You can't bargain with it. You can't appease it away. You can't wish it away.
In fact, this is an enemy that cannot be seduced by expressions of "tolerance" and gestures of goodwill. It is actually repulsed by such moves, seeing them as weakness to be exploited further and signs that their strategy is winning the day.
It didn't begin Sept. 11, 2001, or even with the first World Trade Center bombing or the Iranian revolution of 1979.
This is a war President Jefferson fought.
This is a war that led to Christopher Columbus' voyage west and, ultimately, the discovery of America.
This is a war that nearly led to the conquest of Europe before that.
And it may well lead to the conquest of Europe in the 21st century.
It would not be inaccurate to say this conflict has defined world history for the last 1,300 years.
In the 20th century, we witnessed the high cost of appeasement. We saw it with Nazi Germany. We saw it with the Soviet Union. We saw it with Communist China. And, lately, we see it in the Middle East and in the war with jihadism. Life's lessons are always learned the hard way...


The Devil's Blood.

Where is the outrage? Doesn't anyone realize that the Iranians will continue to seize Westerners until they pay the price for doing so? Why, after all these years, hasn't anyone stopped them?
No Western leader, not Tony Blair, not George Bush, certainly none of the leaders of 'Eurabia' and certainly no one at the United Nations, dares risk the wrath of the ayatollahs and the possibility that Iran might shut off 20% of the world's oil. If ayatollahs laugh, the despots ruling Tehran must be giggling in their beards. For nearly 2 weeks, the islamic radicals running the world's terrorist states once again had leaders of the civilized world cowering and making backroom deals. But the clerics are confident there will be no consequences, all because of oil.
Other than terrorism, Iran has no ability to project power, yet. Its air force is hardly worthy of the name. The United States has the capacity to eliminate the entire Iranian Navy in less than an hour. But Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's hollow threat, "If the Americans make a wrong move toward Iran, the shipment of energy will definitely face danger," is taken seriously in capitals around the globe, because the United States set the golden standard for how to appease terrorists during the first Iranian hostage crisis way back in 1979. It was total capitulation. And it taught the Iranians a lesson about appeasement they never have forgotten. The ayatollahs in Tehran understand the value Westerners place on human life. They grasp the power of images in our media, and the willingness of an accommodating press to show our citizens in peril. And they know that we will do almost anything to save our countrymen. Been there, done that. So the islamic radicals running Iran have just reaffirmed that by threatening the world economy by threatening the supply of oil, they can be lawless with impunity. They use their oil weapon to fuel their apocalyptic nuclear weapons program, with confidence that no one will act against them because Western governments are afraid of energy supply disruptions.

The Iranians have learned much from our cowardice and appeasement. But they shouldn't be the only ones to learn something from this most recent 'hostage event'.
Now that this most recent hostage incident is over, there should be action against the brutal, corrupt islamic radicals ruling in Tehran. But no, Western leaders will settle for more negotiations, ignoring the need to back up diplomacy with the credible threat of force.
Really, to stop hostage taking as an instrument of Iran's state policy requires freeing the world from the dependency on oil. An alternative to oil would make appeasing radical islamic hostage takers unnecessary.
But then again, the picture of GW and 'friend' says enough...


It's as plain as the nose on your face.

We have to be willing to deal with it and to accept the evidence that it is out there, to learn the rules it plays by. If we keep expecting it to play by our rules we will never prevail. We must recognize it when it is present and above all we must learn to listen. Listen to what it says, it will tell you everything it plans to do. Listen for its movements in the thicket of news and political maneuverings. Listen for its hot breath behind us when we least expect it...
From February 4, 2007, New York Times interview of Ayaan Hirsi Ali by Laurie Goodstein:

Q. Have you seen any ideology coming from within Islam that gives young Muslims a sense of purpose without the overlay of militancy?

A. They have no alternative message. There is no active missionary work among the youth telling them, do not become jihadis. They do not use media means as much as the jihadis. They simply — they’re reactive and they don’t seem to be able to compete with the jihadis. And every time there is a debate between a real jihadi and, say, what we have decided to call moderate Muslims, the jihadis win. Because they come with the Koran and quotes from the Koran. The come with quotes from the Hadith and the Sunnah, and the traditions of the prophet. And every assertion they make, whether it is that women should be veiled, or Jews should be killed, or Americans are our enemies, or any of that, they win. Because what they have to say is so consistent with what is written in the Koran and the Hadith. And what the moderates fail to do is to say, listen, that’s all in there, but that wasn’t meant for this context. And we have moved on. We can change the Koran, we can change the Hadith. That’s what’s missing.
"Those who oppose the mullahs oppose Islam itself; eliminate the mullahs and islam shall disappear in fifty years. It is only the mullahs who can bring the people into the streets and make them die for islam, begging to have their blood shed for islam. - Ayatollah Khomein
'The time is fast approaching where the tables are going to turn and the muslims are going to be in the position of being uppermost in strength and, when that happens, people won't get killed - unjustly.' - Abu Usamah.
'God help us in our fight against the kaffir, in every field, in every department of life. We beg you to help us fight against the enemies of our religion.' Another oppositional tempermental rant from an East Midlands mosque.
'Kaffir is the worst word that can ever be written, a sign of infidelity, disbelief, filth, a sign of dirt.' - Sheik Feiz.
'You cannot accept the rule of the kaffir,' 'We have to rule ourselves and we have to rule the others.' - Dr Ijaz Mian.
'Western culture, led by the United States, is the enemy of Islam' - Bilal Phillips.
Islam is the religion of agitation, revolution, blood, liberation and martyrdom. - Morteza Motahari.
Why the reluctance to confront this manifest reality of the creed known as islam?